2 days to go to the glamourous and always exhausting Salone del Mobile.
Hopefully I will have time to see more things as last year I was exhibiting Topoware with Karola. Looking forward to some apperitivos with old friends and new ones.
If you’re in town, ping me!
For a number of reasons, I was looking into cutting my Brussels visit short by a few days. Looked up on my 2 non-favorite super cheap airlines only to find that a flight from Brussels to London does not exist.
That’s the first time a travel resctriction made me think “thank god!”. So I’ll just stay put and enjoy the mussels instead of wasting 10 times my weight in carbon.
As a “frequent traveller” I really enjoy work that rethinks our relationships to maps and geography. I wish I could wear my trips on sleeves sometimes as it would help avoid the very long drawn conversation I need to have with people to explain why I love Europe so much and that the only North American thing about me is my accent.
Lovely work by Elisabeth Lecourt.
I’m trying to tie loose ends before I go spend 2 weeks working with the wonderful people at fo.am in Brussels. Yes grant you it’s not very far, but I really need to step out of London once in a while, to remind myself that the rest of world doesn’t live this frantically.
While I’m there I’ll be the first speaker at Pecha Kucha Brussels where I’ll be talking through a presentation entitled: “Or how I stopped worrying and learnt to love electronics”, about the work we do at Tinker and what I think it means for designers.
If you’re in the area, do ping!
Last week I attended a small seminar in Eindhoven organised by Gregor Klemencic on the role and reactions of China to the design field.
Elaine Ann was there to talk about her work in helping western companies understand and work in the Chinese market, especially doing user research. Having met Elaine last year in Antwerp, it was a pleasure to see her again. Here are some tidbits of insights from her presentation and other speakers at the event in what was in general a stimulating afternoon in Eindhoven’s business park.
- Economy:
China is seen by he rest of the world as enjoying tremendous growth at the moment. What we musn’t forget however is that 80% of the population (or 800 million Chinese!) is still only involved in farming. That’s an absurd amount of people who still don’t necessarily have access to the modern life habitants of cities like Beijing, Schenzhen and Hong Kong have. This perceived growth is impacting access to work for those people as well especially in the manufacturing industry. Companies are now moving away from the southern provinces as it’s getting “too expensive” and moving to the northern parts of China. What will happen when that region too is deemed not economic enough for western needs? Will we move on to someone else? Who?
- Working culture
The Chinese work in a very hierarchical way. A manager will take a decision that will never be questioned by others. Western countries tend to have flatter structures in design environments and this is not something the Chinese are used to yet. Even when a project is in jeopardy or the motivations from the manager or senior person are miss-directed, no one will question it even months down the line.
- Social and business dynamics
Doing user research the way westerners do (here’s 50 bucks, let me take pictures of your home) doesn’t work in China. There is a deep sense of privacy and most user research has to be done with people you build relationships with (Elaine and I discussed the similarities in this respect to Italian culture) as most people would never let you into their home or talk to you about their lives if they don’t know you. This poses of course a (perhaps perceived) problem of objectivity in design research, but also something the designer has to live with. Equally this applies to how people do business: it’s about building a relationship, not necessarily about money, something that can seem very frustrating to some western businessmen (again not unlike the 3h italian lunches). They are generally a very defensive culture, not an aggressive one.
- Defining the design activity
For most Chinese businesses, understanding what we mean by design is not obvious at all. As Elaine pointed out, in Maslow’s mierarchy of needs, as a society, the western world is at the top and has buit meta-activities like design into it’s social and cultural fabric. The Chinese, after only 20 years of “freedom”, are still at the very bottom for the most part, so the idea of design is still quite foreign. This also explains that they haven’t fully understood our creative processes and have only imitated them so far, unable to develop their own. The idea that there are also different types of design and that design is both a verb and a noun is also something they struggle to understand. Clearly the fact that most of us can’t define most of them makes things even worse.
I must say that I found this seminar fascinating, especiall since China has been in the spotlight recently for not so glorious reasons. I remember hearing back in 2004, as I graduated from my BA about how the Chinese market was going to kill our industries, etc… and I still hear or read that refrain in the design industry sometimes. The fact is, not very many of us have gone to China, and so the mystery acts as a veil for the truth. Like any foreign land we’ve had little contact with, (or anything foreign for that matter) the first reaction is to get defensive and worry.
The more educated we become about this perceived “enemy”, the more we might just find ourselves facing new challenges and reevaluating how we view our work and our profession, which surely can’t be a bad thing. 
More from Elaine in this Plastic news article.
The London Underground is one of the few places where you’re likely to find me reading adverts, and I bet I’m not the only one (see Lesson 23). Fact of the matter is the Tube is the fastest way to get where you want to go, but the price to pay is higher than the £1.70 on your Oyster card.
Taking “The Tube”, is a most brutal experience, both socially isolating and physically violating as half of London (it seems) tries to cram themselves in the same carriage as you. Your mind wants to desperately wander as you stand there, squashed, avoiding looking at others at all cost, looking up to the overhead advertising banners. It’s a moment of boredom and mental survival at the same time and somehow having an iPod doesn’t quite help.
Molly Steenson wrote (and spoke at this week’s IxDA conference) about how boredom can influence designers and architects, but what I also find fascinating is how to design for someone who is essentially stuck in an environment that will force them to see your design… out of boredom. Would you want to design for that environment at all?
The motivation for the “user” here is not genuine interest after all, but escapism. Give them something to read, and not only will they read it, but they’ll be grateful for it (which explains why there are about 3 free papers distributed outside of stations in London).
Is there opportunity to change the nature of the environment or to change the nature of the relationship to its content? Should the carriage know where you’re at in your book and display the next page, even if others might read it too? Should there be theme-based carriages? Events at the back, products in the middle, news at the front? Should the real-time location of the train be somehow displayed, showing how long there is to go till the next station and alleviating some of the stress?
Just some thoughts and I don’t claim to think they are all that interesting but I think there are lots of opportunities both for really playful interactions to exist in this shared experience and environment.
So I am no longer a “St-Pancreas virgin” as a fellow traveller in the train referred to it, and it’s frankly really great. It took me a little over 2 hours (or about 40 rows of knitting since that’s what’s making transportation such a breeze these days) to get to Bruxelles and 1h50 minutes to come back! I can’t even get out of London in a car in half that time!
The problem of course with super efficient services everything else starts to pale in comparison and your expectations get skewed.
I was supposed to get to Antwerp for lunchtime on Friday and since it took me 2 hours to cross the Channel and get into Belgium, I figured going to the Netherlands was going to be a breeze… what an idiot!
Turns out it takes about 3 hours both ways and would have cost me about half of the price of my Eurostar ticket. Obviously this was unacceptable and totally unfeasible (It would have meant I would have had to be in Antwerp for a little over 2 hours before turning back to be able to catch my train home), so I had to cancel…
Would I have planned better without the Eurostar? Probably. But I would have ended up taking the less sustainable solution of grabbing a flight back to London… Maybe this is something services like Dopplr can start to address more clearly: managing travel expectations in a world where the diversity in service delivery forces users to make less sustainable decisions.
“You can fly tomorrow and meet Y, and if you’re in town B suggests you go have coffee at Tree & Leaf”.
I’m about to go into hypertravel again but this time it’s a little different. Tuesday and Wednesday will be spent in Milan working with Massimo and greeting our second intern. Then I’m back in London for an evening before embarking on the spanking new Eurostar to Bruxelles (2hours 20 minutes…woah)
The event I was supposed to attend unfortunately got canceled so I will actually be somewhere I haven’t spent any time in, with the people I know being out of town… is that what real tourists do? I doubt it, they usually plan this ahead, it isn’t accidental.
So I’m left with an open day that I can fill up in whatever way I please, so if anyone has suggestions, do ping me! I’m thinking “moules frites”, having a look at cartoons and books, and walking around flickring, buying chocolate…
I’ve been heavily involved working with Blyk and tinker.it lately, so I could do with a day off in an unknown city.
On Friday, I’ll be having lunch with the nice people at 31 Volts in Utrecht… which reminds me I have to write something for their blog… argh.
I grew up all over the place (Paris, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, Canada) and continued to relocate in my adult life (Italy, Holland, now UK) and many of my closest friends have had similar experiences. This got me thinking that the fashionable community of frequent travelers might not necessarily equate the community of frequent re-locators. From children of diplomats or bankers, to anyone who decides to relocate on a whim once they’ve become bored of a city (happens to me a lot), are there any new online or service interactions that can illustrate that granularity of personal experience or cater to those needs? Here are a few “weak signals” I like that could start some thoughts about this area:
We are multicolored is an interested exercise that allows you to draw your own flag based on different flags of countries that have had an impact on you.
I found however that I wanted to include and play around much more than 3 flags. “Where is your home” is question that has become much too broad. Where do you live now? Where have you lived? Where do you call home? are all questions that expand on this idea and could lead to interesting interfaces or visualisations.
What is the difference between relocating somewhere for a few months or a few years? My friend Hayat Benchenaa worked on a service design project for relocation and packing. There’s something interesting here about being able to recreate the idea of “home” quite quickly, before the container full of your belongings arrives. There is potential here in merging some of these ideas with the pre-furnished apartments people rent when staying somewhere for just a few months (very popular in Amsterdam).
Monocle could try catering to re-locators and giving deeper insight into some of the cities they cover instead of skimming through the globe over and over again (the latest one covers Milan in 3 different articles). They could also try catering to women in a different way, other than sticking in awkward fashion ads but that’s another story. There is a market for a magazine that gives insider’s knowledge not only on fashion and politics around the world but also on what makes every city special and different culturally. (Why, for eg. you shouldn’t order a cappucino after 11am in Milan, something re-locators want to know more than people dropping in for a few days of meetings)
Globalisation is a trading concept not a cultural one and there should be services, both online and offline that acknowledge this.
